Product Support is something many of us probably don't think about on a daily basis. If our internet is acting up, we find a customer service number. Bad experience at a restaurant? Send a tweet to the company. Need help setting up a program? Live chat is a few clicks away. The fact that many of us only know the hassle of dealing with the support instead of finding it is key. Companies invest in services, instruction manuals, and website to help users remain satisfied when things go wrong (except for Pearson, they are the worst). So what is support?
I focus on customer service a lot (perhaps because examples are so readily available), but customer services is such a general term. Support is more than fixing an order at a restaurant or smiling when greeting a customer. Support is anything a company provides to help customers solve problems. Furniture from IKEA comes with an instruction manual. That is a form of support. If the furniture is broken, there is a number on the box or receipt to call a service desk to get it replaced. That is support.
Tech companies like Apple and Microsoft have good examples of what support can mean. Microsoft stopped mainstream development of their widely popular operating system Windows 7 in January of 2015. That means they stopped creating products and changes for it. However, they will continue to release security updates (if any breaches are found) until 2020. That is supporting a product. Even when switching from Windows 8 to Windows 10, they gave consumers about a year for a free upgrade to Windows 10. This gave users an incentive to upgrade, but also ample time to make the switch. They released the new OS with trouble shooting software and compatibility fixes. Again, that is support.
Obviously, no one in this class is a tech mogul (yet 😉) but we can look at these things as examples. How can your small business provide support for your product or service? Will you provide a phone number they can call if they have problems? Will you invest in highly detailed instructions? Will you offer warranties in case something breaks? These things can make or break a company's reputation with consumers. It is worth considering if you do not want to end up like Pearson; they are the worst.
A blog to explore the Entrepreneurial Marketing world and record my thoughts/ideas along the way.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Friday, November 11, 2016
Shopping for a Gaming Computer
Recently, I have been in the market to buy a gaming computer. Millions of Americans have a console (Xbox or Playstation), but they have one major draw back: their hardware quickly falls behind the ever-changing gaming market on the computer. (This part is not about my current point, but it does bring up an interesting question about supporting a product, for another post I suppose).
Back to the narrative, I have been scouring the internet looking for "Gaming Computers" and there is a popular debate surrounding them: pre-built or home built. That is, do I buy a computer that is ready to play or order all the parts and assemble it myself to save some money? Both options require that the consumer know a little something about computers. Lets look at this example (http://www.ibuypower.com/Site/Computer/Desktops). Simply scrolling down the page, you'll see the absolute garbage can of letters and numbers that is "computer specifics." Does the average person know the different between a Radeon R7 GPU or an NVIDIA GTX GPU? What is an Intel i5 CPU? WHAT IS A GPU OR CPU?
I only cited one example, but it seems all the pre-built pc markets and part retailers expect the user to do the research to figure out what they need or want to play their games. I think these cites should absolutely tell the specifics of each computer or parts, but none of them answer the average buyer's simple question: Does it do games good? (intentionally obtuse). How do we know buyers want simple plug-and-play systems? Look at the console market I have already mentioned. If you buy an Xbox, you know it will play all the Xbox games in the Xbox store to the best of its ability.
Hunter, how is this about marketing?
Right, yes, marketing. It seems we have two independent solutions to the same market. Gaming computers are the highly customizable yet overly-complex way to play video games. Consoles are the layman's quick fix to having something that can play Call of Duty. And this extends to many markets. You can buy a simple slingshot, or you can buy a slingshot with a laser sight and a telegraphic scope (for some reason). My point is, figure out who your company is in the market. Are you the complicated yet personal solution, or the simple, guaranteed-to-work product? Do you expect people to have knowledge about a certain area before they purchase your product?
As a closing thought: I guarantee the company that figures out how to keep the premium price of PC's while having the simple marketing message "This will play your games perfectly" will break into both markets, and may rise as the preferred choice. Dell's line of PC's named Alienware almost had this idea right, but they executed it the wrong way. They released a customizable console (Alpha) that runs on Steam OS (Steam is a online market for games). The problem is the Alpha limits people to only using Steam games that are compatible with it. It is my opinion that having a three standardized computers guaranteed to run games at Medium, High, or Ultra settings would have much better success breaking into the market. Cosmetic customization would help meet the "I am an individual" market of the Computer Gaming community.
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Double I's
A topic that I enjoy musing about on Sunday drives or while strolling down a grocery aisle is: what makes my preferred brands successful? Lets check out this video first.
In this video, Scott Galloway talks about several services I interact with on a daily basis. Snapchat, Facebook, Amazon, Walmart, Apple. All these companies are common but Galloway discusses why some are more successful than others.
Spotify v. Apple Music
Though I am not quite an audiophile, I do enjoy music as much as (if not more than) the average person. Spotify and Apple both have streaming services that allow users to listen to musics from thousands of artists, but I definitely prefer Spotify. Why is that? Well, I enjoy my usual playlist, but I also want to find new music. I find it much easier to find new artists I like with Spotify because they analyze what I listen to. They create a "Discover Weekly" playlist for me to listen to each Sunday to find new music. And as an added bonus, they send me an email at the end of the month telling me my most played songs, the number of unique artists and tracks listened to, etc. It is equal parts interaction and intelligence.
Amazon v. Walmart
No surprise here, I prefer Amazon to Walmart. Though I do a buy some groceries from Walmart, it is rare I venture in there for non-grocery items. Amazon offers 2-day delivering directly to my door which is convenient enough that I do not mind the wait. Amazon shows me relevant items, offers surveys, etc (again). Walmart just feels impersonal and un-tailored like a suit that is "one size fits all".
I know this class is more focused on small scale business ventures, but it seems the underlying point in what we learn is that some principals in business are constant. Creating something for a customer that feels personal and relevant can go a long way to establish your brand. I believe that a company NEEDS to be intelligent and interactive. It is increasingly easy to gather user data, but often times it seems that user data is squandered on deciding what items to stock up on. Inventory is important, but having a better experience for customers can increase your movement of inventory.
In this video, Scott Galloway talks about several services I interact with on a daily basis. Snapchat, Facebook, Amazon, Walmart, Apple. All these companies are common but Galloway discusses why some are more successful than others.
Spotify v. Apple Music
Though I am not quite an audiophile, I do enjoy music as much as (if not more than) the average person. Spotify and Apple both have streaming services that allow users to listen to musics from thousands of artists, but I definitely prefer Spotify. Why is that? Well, I enjoy my usual playlist, but I also want to find new music. I find it much easier to find new artists I like with Spotify because they analyze what I listen to. They create a "Discover Weekly" playlist for me to listen to each Sunday to find new music. And as an added bonus, they send me an email at the end of the month telling me my most played songs, the number of unique artists and tracks listened to, etc. It is equal parts interaction and intelligence.
Amazon v. Walmart
No surprise here, I prefer Amazon to Walmart. Though I do a buy some groceries from Walmart, it is rare I venture in there for non-grocery items. Amazon offers 2-day delivering directly to my door which is convenient enough that I do not mind the wait. Amazon shows me relevant items, offers surveys, etc (again). Walmart just feels impersonal and un-tailored like a suit that is "one size fits all".
I know this class is more focused on small scale business ventures, but it seems the underlying point in what we learn is that some principals in business are constant. Creating something for a customer that feels personal and relevant can go a long way to establish your brand. I believe that a company NEEDS to be intelligent and interactive. It is increasingly easy to gather user data, but often times it seems that user data is squandered on deciding what items to stock up on. Inventory is important, but having a better experience for customers can increase your movement of inventory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)